|
| |
Carolina Station
8/11/08 Update: Blue text additions and
clarifications in a
Carolina Station Current
July 19, 2008 Situation and Suggestions
section that compares International Paper and Horry
County fiscal impact calculations. Note that the
Carolina
Station Finale reports the subsequent July 22
meeting in which pleas for reconsideration were ignored.
Click the section
or page that you would like to view below:
January 28 Planning Commission
Meeting
-- George Edwards
Action on the Carolina Station development agreement and rezoning request was
deferred again at the January 3 Planning Commission meeting, as
recommended by Janet Carter, Planning Director, and agreed by International
Paper Realty representatives in attendance. The only planning commission members
urging passage at the meeting were Holly Kauffman, District 1, and Rob Wilfong,
District 2 appointee of Brent Schulz, DDC Engineering partner.
In the initial preliminary development agreement, IPR was going to make land
available for three schools within Carolina Station that the school system could
buy at fair market value. Joe Burch of the Horry County school system told
me just prior to the meeting that what I had heard that IPR was now going to
actually dedicate land for two schools within the development (and is said in
The Sun News article linked to below) was not settled. During the meeting,
Wooten said that, although the board of education seemed pleased with that
offer, it had not acted on anything.
There were many items upon which agreement had not yet been met and the only
documentation received since the original preliminary development agreement was
an e-mail that is reproduced below (see Note) as has been furnished in
response to my request to Janet Carter.
As mentioned in the news article linked to below, Wooten said that it was unfair
to require IPR to contribute public facilities that Carolina Station would
require as neighboring developments, that had not offered any of the many things
that IPR was offering, had been approved without requiring them to contribute
all the public facilities they would require.
Comment: Wooten has a point. It is precisely because of this that a
proportionate share ordinance of some kind should be passed that applies to all
new developments and, because that will not likely be done before approval of
the development agreement, the final Carolina Station development agreement
should
include a provision specifically stating that IPR agrees to abide by future
proportionate share ordinances.
Click
here for the excellent news story on the meeting by Mike Cherney of The Sun
News.
Click
Growth Management Tools
and scroll down to view my prior
PowerPoint presentations to County Council committees on proportionate share
ordinances. Click Proportionate Shares
to see the more specific quantifications that
have since evolved for determining fair proportionate shares.
Note: The following is a copy of the e-mail referred to in the meeting
that IPR representatives referred to as a document that augmented the initial
Carolina Station preliminary development agreement
Carter, Janet
From:
Mike Wooten [jmw@ddcinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
November 28, 2007 4:30 PM
To: Carter, Janet
Cc: Gosnell, Steve;
'Sabina T. Finnegan'; Claude Epps; 'Jeff King'; Roland Meyer; 'Josh A. Decker';
'Dan Lambert'; Brent
Schulz; 'Dale Gaff'
Subject: FW:
Carolina Station
Message Page 1 of 2
1/4/2008
Janet:
Thank you for setting up
the meeting this morning to discuss the Carolina Station
project. I believe the
meeting was very beneficial.
In accordance with
Steve's request, I have developed a summary of the elements of
infrastructure which
will be provided by our Client , International Paper Realty
(IPR) . Please keep in
mind that these are the "basics" and, as such, the what, when,
where and how elements
must be defined. The summary is as follows:
1) IPR will provide the
property for three County maintained parks and will fund the
construction activities
for said parks, limited to a maximum of $ 4,750,000. DDC will
provide the County with
a summary listing of the facilities which, we believe, can be
developed within this
budget amount. IPR will not only fund the parks, but will equip
and construct the parks
as well, based on a mutually agreed upon time frame.
2) IPR will donate one
(1) site for EMS/County Police , which will be approximately four (4) acres in
size, and will fund construction activities for this site up to a maximum of $1
million toward construction and equipping the station.
3) IPR will donate one
(1) site for a solid waste convenience/recycling center. This site will be
approximately four (4) acres in size. IPR will, as part of the
construction activities
associated with other elements of the project, clear and grub
this site.
4) IPR will donate two
(2) twenty acre elementary school sites within the limits of
the project . The High
School site has been removed from Carolina Station. A site
adjacent to Carolina
station can be set aside for a high school site. This site is for
purchase and will be
located on IPR property located near the project, but not within
the limits of the
proposed project.
5) IPR will complete all
of the recommendations contained in the Carter Burgess report Memorandum, dated
August, 2007 with revisions dated November 20, 2007 which are depicted on Table
2 of the memorandum which are contiguous , adjacent and touches the project.
Table 2 can be correlated back the original report, which depicts the
intersection improvements in greater detail.
As we discussed, these
are based on an understanding that IPR will be able to develop a funding
mechanism which will reimburse IPR for out-of-pocket expenses associated with
the park/EMS station construction.
James M. Wooten, PE
DDC Engineers, Inc.
1298 Professional Drive
Myrtle Beach, SC 29577
jmw@ddcinc.com
www.ddcinc.com
p (843) 692-3200
f (843) 692-3210
Click here to
view the initial preliminary development agreement.
Click here
to return to table-menu for this page.
Known Carolina Station Status Up to the January 2008 Planning Commission Meeting
--George Edwards The current draft of the
Carolina Station development agreement will be acted upon by the Horry
County Planning Commission tomorrow, Thursday night starting at
5:30 p.m., immediately after general public input for which at least an hour
previous registration is required. There is no public input set up for the
public to specifically discuss the agreement.. With the holidays and other
obligations, I have not yet set aside the time to give a report on the
previous planning commission meeting at which action on the development
agreement was deferred.
A copy of the preliminary development agreement and my published
comments to date regarding it, Carolina Station and two pictorials of
the then proposed development are published elsewhere on this Web site.
Extremely briefly, it will involve commercial and residential development
including in excess of 13,000 homes -- representing, at two people per home,
more than ten percent of the currently estimated total Horry County
population.
At the previous planning commission meeting, I said that the agreement
should either require the Carolina Station development to contribute its
proportionate share of the public facilities it requires or explicitly state
that the development would comply with any future proportionate share
ordinance or provision that county council passes in the 30 years that the
development agreement covers.* Among other things, other citizens expressed
concern that, regardless of road interconnectivity within Carolina Station,
the increased traffic load on S.C. 9, without more external road
construction external to the development, would surely result in traffic
backups similar to those currently experienced on U.S. 501 due to Carolina
Forest. A proportionate share fee reflecting the added exterior road load
that will be caused by Carolina Station could at least offset some of the
taxes from those that would have to otherwise be paid by the general
population.
Earlier today, I asked county staff for an electronic copy of the
current draft of the Carolina Station development, that the deputy planning
director promised she would e-mail me if she found out where it was. At this
point, I have been unable to locate a hard copy of the draft although I had
been told that one exists -- and potentially in Microsoft Word on county
computers, suitable for e-mailing and publication on the GIAC Web site.
As it is, I have no information on what the current draft says except
that Kay Loftus, District 4 board of education representative, tells me
that the school system has been able to negotiate the development's
donating land for two schools rather than just setting aside space for the
school system to buy the land at fair market value as in the preliminary
development agreement. The development will at least require 3 new school
facilities. In my opinion, Carolina Station should pay its proportionate
share of the construction of all the additional school facilities its K-12
students will require, not just dedicate land for some of it. This is what
is right and what the county should be requiring, not negotiating --- for
any new development.*Edwards prepared comments (essentially
eliminated the first paragraph because the information in it had been
covered in lengthy presentations early in the meeting):
I am pleased with many things offered in my reading of the preliminary
Carolina Station agreement including most of it to be zoned for
three-quarter acre single family residence lots, freezing that zoning for
the thirty years of the agreement, promised internal road interconnectivity,
lower density zoning from the outside into and within the traditional
neighborhood core and forty foot deep buffers surrounding the development as
well as the twenty individual development “pods.”
This could all not be offered without the concurrence of International Paper
and the guidance of Mike Wooten with DDC engineering.
I fully appreciate Mike Wooten’s complaint about the unfairness of saddling
Carolina Station with proportionate share requirements of the public
facilities the development will require without equally requiring the same
for other developments. It may not be feasible to complete the planning and
adoption of such proportionate share ordinances within a reasonable time for
reaching a Carolina Station development agreement. If that is true, the
agreement should specify that Carolina Station will fully comply with
proportionate share ordinances adopted in the future.
The published preliminary development agreement shows that land will be
dedicated for public facilities on-site except for schools and land will be
set aside for purchase by the school system to build school facilities. But
the developer does not agree to construct or pay for any of these public
facilities including schools.
I am very pleased to hear that county staff and the developer are
negotiating for the developer to pay for or actually build the on-site
public facilities except for schools. The appraised value of any that they
do build should offset all or a portion of the proportionate share for such
public facilities that the development requires.
Unfortunately, Mike Wooten has strongly indicated that the development can
not and International Paper will not agree that the development will pay for
the construction of the public schools that Carolina Station will require.
If it will not and the development can not pay for them, the rest of the
county really can not afford the development and should not agree to do so.
That portion of Carolina Station’s proportionate share of the public school
facilities the development will require must be agreed to be contributed by
the developer or its sub-developers in the initial development agreement or
implicitly agreed to in explicitly accepting future proportionate share
ordinances and, if those schools do not meet all the development’s needs, it
must in either case agree to contribute its proportionate share of the
off-site school space the development requires.
Almost half again of the fiscal needs and therefore the taxes that must be
collected from Horry County residents are the school systems’. The county
should not negotiate separately from the school system or at least not
approve a plan unless the school system also agrees.
The bottom line is: The Carolina Station development agreement should not be
approved unless it includes provisions for contributing its proportionate
share of the public facilities that the development will require or that it
will comply with future ordinances that require it as well as other
developments to contribute their proportionate share of the public
facilities they require.
Personal Commentary on the Initial Preliminary Development Agreement
-- George Edwards
Let me rapidly convey my general
impression of the current Carolina Station development agreement. It
concerns a huge tract of land south of S.C. 9 and the Long Bay Golf Club that is to
be developed in phases over 30 years. Most of it is to be made up of
roughly one-third acre residential lots (SF-14.5) surrounding a core
traditional neighborhood district (TND) that I assume resembles, at
least in part, the
residential-above-businesses-walking-distance-development currently
being constructed on the old air force base. It will also include
property to be developed in one of the recently renamed Highway
Commercial districts, RE3, which, as I recall, differs from RE4 by not
allowing hog farms or camper rental lots among other things.
It will include internal roads,
park and lake amenities with better road interconnectivity than usual.
It will set aside space for three schools
(subsequently shown as only two schools on a 11/29/07 p.m. County
Council workshop presentation slide) which the school district at
taxpayer's expense can
purchase at market value if it exercises its options soon enough and
will dedicate space for police, fire and public safety facilities to be
constructed at county taxpayer's expense. Horry County Council is to assert that
the agreement is in full accord with its comprehensive plan.
In the interest of getting what I
consider to be the gist of it out as soon as possible, I recite this
without referring to my notes on my top-of-the-head review of the
development agreement. We can all check the details, and perhaps correct
my faulty memory, by reviewing the scanned-in optical character recognition software
version of a preliminary development agreement e-mailed from Ted Van Weeren
reproduced in a separate section below and referring to
the county zoning district
requirements published on the Horry County Web site,
www.horrycounty.org.
Mr. Van Weeren volunteered to scan
and e-mail me the Carolina Station preliminary development agreement when I phoned him about The Sun News essay he wrote
emphasizing the need for planning the public facilities that Carolina
Station would require.
In my mind, this preliminary Carolina Station development agreement is
completely inadequate from the point of view of the county.
And I don't know whether any adequately planned agreement
for Carolina Station is feasible and agreeable between the
parties in what either consider is an acceptable time frame. The only possibility I see for an agreement
adequately protecting the county is an explicit stipulation
that it will be subject to an adequate public facilities
ordinance* with proportionate share provisions, as I have
outlined elsewhere, that are not in place by the time a joint agreement
is signed. I don't know whether International Paper
would buy such, and I don't believe, failing that, that the county should sign
anything less until such time as such ordinance(s) are in
place.
The following are
copied from PowerPoint "slides"
on Carolina Station given in the November 29 Horry County Council workshop.
Summary of project
-
• The project
is located between the corridor roads off of Highway 9 and
905.
-
• Consists of
a total of +/-6,276.52 acres.
-
• Currently
zoned Forest Agricultural (FA) and Commercial Forest
Agricultural (CFA).
-
Proposed Zoning - (SF-14.5) Single Family Residential
14,500 square feet
(RE-3) Convenience and Auto Related Services District, and (PDD)
Planned Development District with (TND)Traditional
Neighborhood District .
-
• The Planned
Development District (PDD) will be a mixed-use district
fashioned after the Traditional Neighborhood Ordinance (TND)
which is +/-1,132.61 gross acres consisting of character
areas of development including, live/work commercial,
commercial, multi-family and single-
family residential ranging from SF-6 to SF-14.5.
Project Summary Table
|
Character
Areas
|
Gross Acreage
|
Upland Acreage
|
Proposed Residential
|
Residential Density
|
Proposed Commercial
|
|
SF (14.5)
|
±3,926
|
±3,695
|
7,200 du
|
1.8 du/ac
|
N/A
|
|
PDD
|
±1,102
|
±865
|
6,600 du
|
Varies
|
1,300,000sf
|
|
RE-3
|
±37
|
±33
|
N/A
|
|
350,000sf
|
|
Total
|
±6,277
|
±4,962
|
13,500 du
|
2.6 du/ac
|
1,650,000 sf
|
For the Community
-
• EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT SERVICES (EMS) {1}
+/- 4 acres
-
• PARKS / OPEN
SPACE {4}
+/- 106 acres (3 public parks) /
+/- 20 acres (1 private park)
-
• SCHOOL SITES
{2}
+/- 40 acres (2 elementary sites) Proposed offsite
High/Middle
-
• WORSHIP
CENTERS {5}
+/- 53.0
acres
-
• RECYCLING
CENTER {1}
+/- 4 acres
-
• STREETSCAPE
AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND SIDEWALKS
-
• UNDISTURBED
40’ PERIMETER BUFFER
Click
here to view a pictorial of
the proposed Carolina Station development copied from a Power Point
"slide" given in the November 29 Horry County Council workshop.
(Caveat: to avoid having to reload this entire Web site to
return, you must first click menu items uncovered by a pictorial before
clicking a desired menu item on the new page.)
Click here for a pictorial
from another presentation. Among other things, more road names are
clearly shown.
Click here
to return to table-menu for this page.
I completely agree with what she was quoted
as saying in the newspaper. County council publicly grieves about poor
planning in the past. The county should take the time to do Carolina
Station right or not do it at all -- at least until the county has its
act together enough to get the same concessions as an adequate public
facility ordinance* with proportionate share provisions from
International Paper. I believe we would be better off letting the land
be developed a piece at a time until such time as an adequate public
facility ordinance* with proportionate share provisions to apply to all
new developments gets in place. Mike Wooten, DDC Engineering
representative for International Paper -- owner of the Carolina Station
land, was already grousing that it was
unfair that they should be asked to do things that others were not
required to do.
Alternatively, the
development agreement should specifically specify that the development
will be subject to an anticipated adequate public facility ordinance*
with proportionate share provisions when that ordinance is put in place.
Horry County planning director Janet Carter
said she sees the only way for an adequate public facility ordinance* to
be implemented is to have a capital improvement plan in place, with the,
to me, implied funding by taxing everyone in the county. She says that
she doesn't believe it can hold back development in an area without
adequate public facilities for more than a year. She appears to share the local
attitude that any moratorium for any reason is verboten.
Carter said that a capital improvement plan
is necessary before enacting a public facilities ordinance. A capital
improvement plan is called for in the S.C. impact fee statute, but the
representative of the widely reputed Tischler organization said at this
workshop that another jurisdiction, Somerville, they had consulted for won S.C.
supreme court approval under the current impact fee statute by using, as
I understood it, their current level of service rather than requiring a
capital improvement plan. From this, one wonders whether the lengthy
time that preparation of a full-blown capital improvement plan is
required for an adequate public facilities ordinance*. An adequate public
facilities ordinance* is called out in the comprehensive plan that the
preliminary Carolina Station development agreement says that county
council (if it were to sign it) agrees complies with that comprehensive
plan.
DDC Engineering partner Mike Wooten
(representing International Paper) said that he was amenable to the
results of the Horry County Tischler software** being applied to
Carolina Station. But he wanted to participate in its development.
Carter did not believe the software
would be adequately developed to apply it to Carolina Station. I wonder
how far away it is from development insofar as other public facilities
than schools are concerned. Regardless, it certainly does not yet
include school facilities which it should to be adequate. To me, this is
just that much more reason to defer Carolina Station approval until the
software is adequate to determine its fair proportionate share of the
public facility it requires, or specifically require in the development
agreement that Carolina station comply with any such future ordinance
requirement.
Carolina Station is a near ideal model
to focus on in working out the proportionate share developments should
contribute county-wide.
Wooten was given free reign to comment copiously
throughout the meeting. I finally asked if I could be allowed two
questions. Gilland first asked if anyone of the half dozen council
people in attendance had any questions. Then, their having none, she
granted me permission to ask my questions.
I asked if I was right in understanding
that the (vaunted) public facilities other than schools by the developer
were no more than a dedication of land for such as fire and police
facilities to be built at public expense paid for by all
resident taxpayers. Steve Gosnell, head of
infrastructure and regulations, said that that was still under
negotiation. I said that the second of my questions was if I understood
properly that insofar as the three schools (according to a preliminary
agreement but the PowerPoint presentation at the work shop showed only
two) were concerned Carolina
Station was just setting aside land that the school district could buy
at fair market value at public expense paid for by all
resident taxpayers.
Wooten said something to the effect that I
was premature. I asked when we would know what the development agreement
was going to say.
Now, Gilland interrupted and said we should
discuss that privately in the halls. There were other matters to be
taken care of in the meeting. I felt, as I always feel, that developers
get all kinds of time but private citizen comments are at
best, put on the back burner.
As it is, developers negotiate with
Planning, frequently with no public notice, the results are presented in
Planning commission meetings and later to the county council. In front
of both bodies, the public is allowed to speak in public input,
frequently without full information, before developers make their
presentations, then developers are generally given the floor to answer
questions and further make their case with no opportunity for anyone
else to offer rebuttals. There should be provisions for an ombudsman
representing Horry County everyday citizens to sit in on and have a
voice in all
negotiations on all developments, certainly all major developments
like Carolina Station, and for Tischler Horry County software**
development if developer representatives are given such access as Wooten requested in the meeting.
After the meeting I talked to Gosnell and
said that I had hoped to get a hard copy of the Carolina Station
development plan (so I could touch up areas that the OCR process in
scanning did not reproduce), but I gathered it was a waste of time if it
was still being negotiated (with the developer -- it is not in the
standard process to negotiate with private citizens who get the finished
product at the last minute if at all). He said that it was premature. I
did not understand if I was told how I was to find out when it was ready,
pointing out that we were supposed to be given public input on the
Carolina Station development plan at the December 6 planning commission
meeting next Thursday. He assured me we would get more than land
dedication.
Gosnell telephoned me today (the 4th.) to tell me that I
misunderstood what he had said in writing that school district officials had
been invited to sit down with them (county staff) but had not chosen too.
He corrected that by saying
they had initially. I had otherwise corrected the record here yesterday on the
3rd. after listening to the tape
of the last planning commission meeting for when the first Carolina Station public
hearing was held. On that tape it was clear that Joe Burch had
participated in early negotiations with Horry County staff on behalf of
the school system. On talking to Janet Carter, immediately after
listening to the tape, she said that Wooten had told her that negotiations had been going on separately
with the school district after the
earlier joint meetings.
When I got home, I called Kay Loftus, my
District 4 school board representative, telling her this and asking if
she would get something done about it, noting also that there was never
anyone from the school system in attendance on the comprehensive plan
although there was a seat for them there and that a principal planner
that came aboard several months ago said his calls to the school
district went unanswered. To hear Loftus, she totally agreed with the
idea of an Adequate Public Facility Ordinance* with proportionate share
provisions. I said great now it was a question of her doing something to
get the school system involved. She sounded agreeable but sounded
dubious if she alone could accomplish anything. We need to put pressure
on the entire school board.
This morning, school board chairman Will
Garland responded to an earlier e-mail I had sent to him and Loftus. I
responded with an e-mail repeating what I had told Loftus.
* Click
Growth Management Tools
to see discussions describing Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances
including earlier presentations and the most recent one presented by
county staff at the 11/29/07 Horry County council workshop and a
Proportionate Share ordinance. The latter is described separately, but
it could be a portion of an Adequate Public Facilities ordinance. If it
is not, an APFO could, and likely would, just end up causing a further
tax burden on the rest of the county residents who would not otherwise
require the additional public facilities required by new developments.
**The Horry County Tischler software uses
detailed Horry County inputs to independently determine the capital and
operating costs to county government for various developments and the
offsetting fees and taxes to pay for those costs. Points were made about the Tischler
analysis being a fiscal analysis as to government expenses not an
economic analysis about jobs brought in. If economic benefits to
retailers from the more consumer residents result, those retail
operations should be the ones saddled with the additional taxes or fees
not other current residents. But no one made such a point.
When asked, the Tischler representative
said the break-even point for a single family home to pay for itself in
Horry County
was more than one-half million dollars. And this analysis does not
include school district expenses that far out-weigh those of the rest of
the county. He also said that their analysis showed a Walmart shopping
center to be a net loss as to taxes versus revenues. That came as a surprise to me because I thought commercial developments
always paid for themselves.
Click
here to
view the Horry County Tischler Software PowerPoint Presentation given at
the 11/29/07 Horry County Council Workshop.
--------------
A PowerPoint presentation was also given
at the workshop pointing out the wisdom of allocating more funds for
road maintenance now because a curve showing the costs of repair to
roads inadequately maintained over time did not just increase linearly
but after a few years, instead, curved rapidly and radically upwards.
Click here
to return to table-menu for this page.
Preliminary
Carolina Station Development Agreement
This is a scanned copy of a preliminary
(its particulars are still being negotiated) Carolina Station
development agreement as interpreted by optical character recognition
software:
_______________________________________________
----COPY E-MAILED FROM TED VAN WEEREN --
|
STATE
OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF HORRY
|
|
CAROLINA STATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
This Development Agreement
("Agreement") is entered into thi~
________________ ,?ay of
, 2007
by International Paper Realty Corporation
(hereinafter Property Owner ), and
-H-o-rry-C-o-unty
(hereinafter "County").
A. Authorization:
This Agreement is entered into pursuant to
the South Carolina
Local
Government Development Agreement Act,
Section 6-31-10, et.seq., Code of Laws of
South Carolina (1976), as amended and
pursuant to Chapter 15, A~ic.le VI, of the
Code of Ordinances of Horry County, South
Carolina. The Planning Commission for Horry
~ounty, South Carolina, held two public
hearings regarding this Development
Agreement as required by
South
Carolina Code Section 6-31-50, on
_______________ , 2007, and ______________
,2007,
respectively. The County Council for Horry
County, South Carolina, has approve~ the
wit~in
Development Agreement pursuant to Ordinance
No. ____________ ' adopted on third reading
,2007.
-------- |
|
B. Overview: The
Carolina Station Development (hereinafter
"Carolina Station" or
"Development" or "Project") is located in
Horry County, South Carolina and includes
approximately 6,276.52 acres which includes
a combination of three (3) primary tax map
numbers; 074-00-01-001, 088-00-01-040,
088-00-01-068, and two (2) out parcels
identified by tax map numbers 089-00-01-051
and 101-00-04-009 to be developed. Carolina
Station will be located between Highway 9 to
the north, Highway 905 to the east, West
Bear Grass Road to the south, and Highway
348 to the west. The primary access to the
property will be off of Highway 9. Carolina
Station will be a planned community designed
to enhance continuity and improve the
quality of life of its residents while
preserving natural and scenic areas within
the community. Carolina Station is zoned as
set forth in the Proposed Zoning Delineation
and Acreage Chart, a copy of which is
attached hereto as "Exhibit A"
(hereinafter "Zoning Delineation Chart") and
incorporated herein by reference. The
Development will be constructed in phases
over a thirty (30) year period. The
Development will incorporate single family
residential neighborhoods which surround the
Village Core areas that will be appropriate
for a viable self sustaining community.
Carolina Station will be a low density
development (with lot sizes not smaller than
14,500 square feet) surrounding a Village
core area. The overall density in Carolina
Station will be approximately 17.932
dwelling units. There will be twenty (20)
single family tracts of development (at
SF14.5) surrounding the Village core area.
The Village core area will provide
interconnectivity by way of sidewalks,
greenways, and tramways and will allow for
mixed uses including, but not limited to,
single family residential units, multifamily
residential townhouse/ condominium units,
continuing care retirement communities,
commercial uses including but not limited to
retail, restaurants, businesses and other
uses that will service the area. In order to
promote public health, safety and general
welfare, Carolina Station will provide for
public facilities within the Development;
said facilities to consist of public
schools, emergency services, public parks, a
recycling center, worship centers, and other
such uses. Dispersed throughout the Carolina
Station Development will be five (5) tracts
dedicated as worship center locations for
uses including but not limited to churches,
synagogues, and mosques. Land for two (2)
emergency service facility locations will be
provided for uses including but not limited
to fire, police and EMS. There will also be
three (3) public parks and one (1) private
park for use by property owners in the
Development. A portion of this Development
will include an existing, currently active
mining operation known as Wakestone. The
Property Owner has previously entered into a
lease with Wakestone that expires in 2025
(hereinafter "Wakestone Lease"). On or
before the expiration of the Wakestone
Lease, Wakestone shall provide the Property
Owner |
|
with a
reclamation plan that will meet and or
exceed the South Carolina Department of
Health and Environmental Control (DHEC)
requirements that will include creation of a
large lake. Upon expiration of the Wakestone
Lease, the Property Owner will include lake
front lots as an int~~ral design to a
portion of single family subdivisions
appurtenant to the lake. Further, the
remaining portion of the lake will abut a
portion of the private park that will
include a walking trail along one
side
of the proposed lake.
C. Statement of
Development Intent: The purpose of
Carolina Station is to provide a
unique, individually planned community
located in the north central corridor of
Horry County. Unique land uses and
innovative site planning techniques will be
integrated in order to improve the design,
character and quality of life in a
development that will also preserve the
natural and scenic areas within the
community. The low density Development will
incorporate single family residential
neighborhoods around the Village core area
that will be appropriate for a viable self
sustaining community. The Village core area
will allow for mixed uses including, but not
limited to, single family residential units,
multifamily residential townhouse/
condominium units, continuing care
retirement communities, commercial uses
including but not limited to retail,
restaurants, businesses and other uses that
will service the area. In order to promote
public health, safety and general welfare,
Carolina Station will provide for public
facilities around the core area of the
Development; said facilities to consist of
public schools, emergency services, public
parks, a recycling center, worship centers,
and other such uses. |
|
This
Development Agreement is being entered into
pursuant to South Carolina Code Section
631-10 e1. seq. , to set forth the overall
development plan of Carolina Station,
provide developers with assurance that upon
receipt of development permits, they may
proceed in accordance with existing laws and
policies subject to the conditions of this
Agreement, and to provide the County with
adequate public benefits aimed at promoting
the health, safety and general welfare of
the community. |
|
Pursuant to the foregoing, and to effectuate
the orderly development of Carolina Station,
the parties hereby agree that the following
terms and conditions shall govern the
Development:
1.
Leqal Description of Property and
Owners of Property: |
|
A. Legal
Description: The property comprising
Carolina Station is described as:
|
|
ALL
AND SINGULAR that certain piece, parcel or
tract of land situate, lying and being in
Horry County, South Carolina, containing
approximately 6,276.52 acres and being shown
and designated on a plan entitled "Master
Site Plan for Carolina Station" prepared by
DOC Engineers.
B.
Legal. and
Eq~itab~e Property Owners:
The legal
and equitable property owner of Carolina
Station
IS
International Paper Realty Corporation of
7421 Carmel Executive Park, Suite 315,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28226.
|
|
2.
Duration of
~qreem~nt and Development Schedule:
The
duration of the Agreement shall be fo~ a
period ~f thirty (30) y~~rs fo!lowing the
date of final reading by County Council
adopting the ordlnanc~ authorizing this
Agreement (hereinafter "Termination Date").
The Agreement shall terminate upon the
expiration of said time period. However, the
parties hereto are. not ,precluded from
extending the Termination Date by mutual
agreement or from . ~nterlng Into
s.ubsequent development agreements. It is
difficult to estimate the specific date by
which any given tract of the Development
might be fully developed.
|
|
Market
conditions and the demand for housing and
other planned uses will dictate the speed of
development. However, the estimated
development schedule is as follows:
|
|
Phase
|
Area
|
Estimated
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Commencement |
Completion
Date |
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Phase I-A
|
portion of
single |
|
|
|
|
family home
|
|
5 years
from the |
|
|
parcels
|
2010
|
date of
this |
|
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
Phase I-B
|
portion of
single |
|
|
|
|
family home
|
|
10 years
from the |
|
|
parcels,
one |
|
|
|
|
park, one
|
2010
|
date of
this |
|
|
education
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
facilities,
two |
|
|
|
|
worship
centers, |
|
|
|
|
recycling
center |
|
|
|
Phase II
|
portion of
|
|
|
|
|
Neighborhood |
|
10 years
from the |
|
|
Area,
residential |
2012
|
date of
this |
|
|
and
commercial |
|
Agreement
|
|
|
areas, one
|
|
|
|
|
emergency
|
|
|
|
|
service
facility |
|
|
|
Phase III
|
portion of
single |
|
|
|
|
family
parcels, |
|
|
|
|
two worship
|
|
|
|
|
centers,
|
|
|
|
|
Neighborhood |
2013
|
15 years
from the |
|
|
Center
Area, |
|
date of
this |
|
|
Neighborhood |
|
Agreement
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
Area, one
park |
|
|
|
|
and two
|
|
|
|
|
educational
|
|
|
|
|
facilities
|
|
|
|
Phase IV
|
single
family |
|
|
|
|
home
parcels, |
|
20 years
from the |
|
|
one park,
two |
2014
|
date of
this |
|
|
worship
centers |
|
Agreement
|
|
|
and one
|
|
|
|
|
emergency
|
|
|
|
|
service
facility |
|
|
|
Phase V
|
single
family |
|
|
|
|
home
parcels |
|
25 years
from the |
|
|
|
2017
|
date of
this |
|
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
Phase VI
|
single
family |
|
|
|
|
home
parcels |
2026
|
30 years
from the |
|
|
and one
park |
|
date of
this |
|
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
The
above development schedule does not include
infr.astructure or construction of roads,
drainage systems and utilities. These are
all estimated to commence o~ or near the end
of 2008. The failure to meet an estimated
commencement or completion date shall not in
and of itself constitute a material breach
of this Agre~ment, .bu.t n:ust be
judged based upon the totality of the
circumstances, including without limitation
market
conditions.
Master Site Plan:
The Master
Site Plan is attached hereto as "Exhibit
B" and incorporated herein. The Master
Site Plan identifies the following items:
A.
Primary collector roadway systems and their
connection to the local roadway system;
B.
Approximate size, configuration and location
of development tracts;
C.
Approximate limits of jurisdictional
wetlands;
D.
Approximate size, configuration and location
of, civic sites ( including but not limited
to parks and public safety sites), worship
centers, and schools as they become
identified; |
|
E.
Permitted land uses by parcel as rezoned and
approved by Horry County;
|
|
F.
Other relevant information as may be
required pursuant to the provisions of the
Horry County Zoning Ordinance.
|
|
4.
Development
Uses/Densitv:
The Property has been rezoned as set forth
in Zoning Delineation Chart. The chart sets
forth a zoning designation for each tract
and the approximate acreage designated to
each use. Carolina Station will be a low
density development (with lot sizes not
smaller than 14,500 square feet) surrounding
a Village core area. The density of Carolina
Station will be determined by lot size,
developable acreage and the Horry County
Zoning Ordnance. The overall density in
Carolina Station will be approximately
17.932 dwelling units. The exact amount of
dwelling units will be provided after the
available upland acreage is determined by a
final wetlands delineation. The design
criteria for each tract shall be governed by
the Horry County Zoning Ordinance and Design
Guidelines as set forth in paragraph five
(5) below. |
|
5.
Desiqn
Guidelines:
In
order to enhance the Development, the
Property Owner and
lor
their
assigns may adopt a set of Design Guidelines
attached hereto as "Exhibit C" and
incorporated herein by this reference
(hereinafter "Guidelines"). The Guidelines,
along with the Horry County Zoning Ordinance
and this Agreement, will govern the design
and development of each tract. The
Guidelines may be more restrictive in
certain respects than the Horry County
Zoning Ordinance requirements for the
districts allowed under this Agreement and
further set forth in paragraph six (6)
below. An example of the provisions in the
Guidelines that are more restrictive than
the Harry County Zoning Ordinance
Requirements are those describing the buffer
areas and the interconnectivity between
neighborhoods within Carolina Station. There
will be a forty (40) foot buffer area around
the exterior of Carolina Station and between
the individual pods. The roads within
Carolina Station have been designed to
promote interconnectivity by providing
access from the spine roads and between the
pods. The Guidelines may be adopted by the
homeowners' associations as the Covenants
and Restrictions for the neighborhoods in
Carolina Station. Where the Zoning Ordinance
and Guidelines conflict, the more
restrictive shall control.
|
|
Zoninq Districts:
Development tracts within Carolina Sta~ion
will. be developed in
accordance with the provisions of the Horry
County Zoning Ordinance and Land
.
Development Regulations in existence as of
the date ~ereof. . Eac~ tract and the zoning
district that applies to that tract are set
forth in the ZO~lng Del~neatlon ,~ha~ .an~,
the tables attached as "Exhibit
0"
(Estimated Single Family Density) and
ExhibIt E (Conceptual POD Character Area
Designation an? De~si~ies for the. Villa~e
Core Area and Grand Total by Land Use). The
following zoning districts as defined .In
~he current Horry County Zoning Ordinance
will be utilized by the Property Owner
within the .. Carolina Station Development:
Single Family (SF-14.5), Planned Development
District (POD), and Convenience and Auto
Related Services District (RE-3). The
Development tracts may not be rezoned
without the approval of the Property Owner
and the County.
A.Single
Family (SF-14.5):
This single
family element of Carolina Station will
consist of an approximate total gross
acreage of 5,137.19 acres. The uses in the
SF-14.5 district will be single family
homes, public and private parks, a
recreational lake, public schools, emergency
services (fire, police, EMS stations),
worship centers (churches, synagogues,
mosques) and their associated accessory
uses. A table setting forth the approximate
gross density for the residential portion of
the SF-14.5 district is attached hereto as
"Exhibit
0"
and
incorporated herein by this reference.
"Exhibit
0"
designates
approximately twenty (20) tracts of land or
"pods" at the SF-14.5 density. Other parcels
and their uses under this zoning designation
will be: three (3) tracts for schools, two
(2) tracts for emergency services, one (1)
tract for a recycling center, five (5)
tracts for worship centers, and four (4)
tracts or parcels for parks/open space for
public and private community use. A table
setting forth the approximate gross acreage
for these parcels is attached hereto as
"Exhibit E" and incorporated herein by
this reference. The Master Site Plan
indicates the approximate gross acreage of
each pod. The development of these pods will
be guided by the Horry County Zoning
Ordinance, this Agreement and Guidelines
adopted by the Property Owner. The upland
density for the SF-14.5 district will be
calculated after the available upland
acreage is determined by a final wetlands
delineation. |
|
8.
Village Core
Planned Development District (POD):
The
Village Core Planned Development District
element of Carolina Station will consist of
approximately of 1,102.61 acres of land. The
POD will incorporate the requirements of the
Traditional Neighborhood District (TND) as
set forth in the Horry County Zoning
Ordinance, Article VII, Section 750. A table
indicating the number of character area
designations, proposed uses, approximate
gross and upland acreage, and approximate
upland density is attached hereto as
"Exhibit E". "Exhibit E"
designates specific "character areas" with a
specific amount of acreage devoted to a
neighborhood center area, a neighborhood
general residential area, and a neighborhood
edge area. Each character area is assigned
uses as permitted by the TND Ordinance. The
POD will designates "bubble areas" within
the character areas which will indicate the
approximate location of uses allowed and
include the proposed location of access and
interconnectivity within the village core
area. The Property Owner may move the bubble
areas to different locations within the POD
without resulting in a major change to the
POD. |
|
C.
Convenience
and Auto Related Services (RE-3) District:
The RE-3 zoning district will provide the
ability for commercial uses that may not
ordinarily be permitted in the Traditional
Neighborhood District or meet Carolina
Station's Guidelines for |
|
the
POD. Although the RE-3 district allows
residential us~s, the ~ropert~ Owner has
prohibited residential uses in the areas
zoned RE-~
I~
Ca.rollna
Station: I~ addition to residential uses,
the following uses are prohibited In the
RE-3 ~Istrlct and throughout Carolina
Station: adult entertainment, gaming, and
industrial uses. The permitting process for
the RE-3 district will !ncl~de approval by
the Carolina Station Master Association to
ensure the GUidelines are met. Further, any
future development must be approved by the
Horry County Zoning Administrator and Horry
County Council to determine if such
development meets the requirements of the
Horry County Zoning Ordinance and this
Agreement.
D.
Prohibited
Uses.
The
following uses are prohibited throughout
Carolina Station: adult entertainment,
gaming, and industrial uses.
|
|
7.
Description
of Public Facilities:
The
following public facilities will service
Carolina Station:
A.
Water and
Sewer.
Grand Strand
Water and Sewer Authority will provide
adequate water and sewer to the Development
and shall extend services as needed for each
stage of the Development. Such service shall
be in accordance with the development
schedule for the project as set forth in
paragraph two (2) of this Agreement.
|
|
B.
Education.
The Property Owner has reserved three (3)
public school sites in Carolina Station that
are available for purchase by the Horry
County School Board. Said sites are set
forth in the Master Site Plan. The
acquisition of these sites will be at fair
market value at the time of purchase, based
on an appraisal. The Horry County School
Board (hereinafter referred to as "School
Board") shall purchase one site by the end
of 2010 and two sites by the end of 2013.
Construction of such facilities shall be in
accordance with the development schedule for
the project as set forth in paragraph two
(2) of this Agreement. If the education
sites are not purchased by the dates
mentioned above, the County and School Board
have failed to enter into a mutual agreement
extending these dates, or the County plans
to develop the property for any use other
than the ones identified herein, these sites
will automatically revert back to the
Property Owner or its assigns.
|
|
C.
Public
Parks.
The
Development will include three (3) public
parks, totaling approximately 111 acres, for
park and recreational purposes as set forth
on the Master Site Plan. The construction,
improvement, and maintenance of said sites
shall be the responsibility of Horry County
and shall be completed in accordance with
the development schedule for the project as
set forth in paragraph two (2) of this
Agreement. If the construction of the parks
fails to meet the development schedule for
the project as set forth in paragraph two
(2) of this Agreement, the park sites will
automatically revert back to the Property
Owner or its assigns.
D.
Police, Fire
and Public Safety.
The Property
Owner will dedicate a total of two (2) sites
in the Development to be used as police,
fire or emergency services, as set forth on
the Master Site Plan. Said sites total
approximately 7.49 acres. Construction of
such facilities shall be at the expense of
Horry County and completed in accordance
with the development schedule for the
project as set forth in paragraph two (2) of
this Agreement. If the construction of these
facilities fails to meet the development
schedule for the project as set forth in
paragraph |
|
two (2)
of this Agreement, these sites will
automatically revert back to the Property
Owner or its assigns.
Recycling Center.
The Property
Owner will dedicate one (1) site in th~
Development to be used as a recycling
center. Said site totals approximately 3.3
acres. The construction, improvement, and
maintenance of said site shall be the
responsibility of Horry County and shall be
completed in accordance with t~e development
schedule for the project as set forth in
paragraph two (2) of this
Agreement. If the construction of the
recycling center fails to meet the
.
development schedule for the project as set
forth in paragraph two (2) of this
Agreement, the recycling center site will
automatically revert back to the Property
Owner or its assigns. |
|
8. Dedication of
Land for Public Purposes:
|
|
A.
Civic Sites.
The
Property Owner has reserved for fee simple
dedication to Horry County a total of
approximately 121.79 acres for use as civic
sites including three (3) public parks, two
(2) EMS substations and one (1) recycling
center. Said property, with direct access to
a public road, shall be dedicated as set
forth in paragraph seven (7) of this
Agreement, and shall be subject to
restrictions on use for the purposes set
forth herein, as well as to mutually
agreeable development standards. These sites
are identified on the Master Site Plan. The
construction, improvement, and maintenance
of said sites shall be the responsibility of
the County. These sites may only be used for
the following purposes: |
|
1.
Neighborhood and Community Parks
2.
Police, Fires and EMS substations
3.
Recycling Center |
|
Any
sites reserved for dedication by Property
Owner for public use, shall revert to
Property Owner if the County fails to meet
the development schedule as set forth in
paragraph two (2) of this Agreement or plans
to develop the property for any use other
than the ones identified herein.
|
|
B.
Road Rights
of
Way.
The Property
Owner will improve to County standards and
dedicate the roads shown on the Master Site
Plan and identified as Carolina Station
Parkway and Old Tram Road to the County as
public roadways. The total acreage of the
roadways to be dedicated is approximately
98.5 acres. Upon acceptance by the County,
Property Owner will have no further
obligation to improve, maintain, or repair
the dedicated portions of the roadways. All
roadways in Carolina Station will be public
roadways. |
|
C.
Preservation
of
Environmentally Sensitive Property:
In the
development of Carolina Station, the
Property Owner will preserve any
environmentally sensitive areas pursuant to
the current Horry County land development
regulations and all other applicable laws
and regulations. |
|
9.
Stor~ Water
and Wetlands Information.
Best Management Practices (BMP's) as
descnbed by the State of South Carolina,
will be used during all construction phases
of |
|
Development. Erosion and Sediment Control
requirements as defined by the State of
South Carolina and the Horry County
Engineering Department will be met to
maintain environmental integrity of the
Development. All on-site detention ponds and
storm water drainage collection systems will
meet the requirements of Horry County Storm
Water Ordinance and address the following:
A.
Post-development peak discharge rates from
the 25-year storm are reduced to no more
than the 1 O-year pre-development rates.
|
|
B.
Post-development peak discharge rates from
the 1 DO-year storm will not exceed the 1
DO-year pre-development rates.
|
|
10.
Master
Traffic Plan.
A traffic study will be conducted by
Carter-Burgess Inc., and will be
incorporated as part of this Agreement.
Average daily traffic generated rates (or
average daily trips) is defined in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation Manual,
th
Edition. Average daily trips will be defined
by the Carolina Station Traffic Impact
Analysis when completed. |
|
11.
Description
of All Local Development Permits.
The Development must meet all current
permitting requirements including but not
limited to subdivision approval, building
code permits, permits required by SCDHEC
(water, sewer, and water wells), permits
required by the Army Corps of Engineers, and
permits required by SCDNR and OCRM (storm
water, erosion and sediment control).
Provided, however, the failure of this
Agreement to address a particular permit,
condition, term, or restriction does not
relieve the developer of the necessity of
complying with the law governing the
permitting requirements, conditions, terms,
or restrictions. |
|
12.
Findinq that
the Development is Consistent With the
County's Master Plan and Land Development
Requlations.
Horry County Council hereby finds that the
proposed Development and this Agreement are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of
Horry County and any applicable land
development regulations. |
|
13.
Description
of Any Conditions, Terms. Restrictions, or
Other Requirements Determined to Be
Necessary By Horry County For the Public
Health Safety or Welfare of its Citizens:
All
conditions and terms applicable to the
Development shall be as set forth in this
Agreement and the attached Master Site Plan.
|
|
14.
Preservation
and Restoration of Historic Structures.
While there are no historic structures
located on the site of this Development,
there is a deep history rooted in this area.
The historical significance of this tract
dates back to the 1800's when timber became
an important commodity in Horry County. The
establishment of lumber mills in Conway,
Little River, Bucksport, and Georgetown
created the need for transporting the
harvested logs other than by oxen or mule,
from this tract and other pine forest areas.
In the latter portion of the 19th
century, The Chadbourn Lumber Company of
North Carolina built a railroad from their
Wilmington, Columbia, and Augusta line south
to the Waccamaw River to open up the forests
of northern Horry County. The line ran from
Mt. |
|
Tabor
to Conway. In 1894 the Atlantic Coast Lumber
Company brought this line to their rail
system. Other lumber companies operating in
Horry County constructed tram roads or
tramways which carried logs by rail on
flatbed cars pulled by small steam powered
engines to the rail system or directly to
timber mills for processing and exportation.
Assigning the name "Carolina Station" to
this Development is intended to preserve
some of this history and carry on this
general theme of the rail, logging, and
timber mill industry that was important to
the growth of Horry County. In order to
further preserve some of this history, the
Property Owner plans to carry out a railway
station theme throughout the Development in
the naming of streets, creation of signage
and landscape features. |
|
15.
Applicable
Laws and Requlations:
Subject to the provisions of South Carolina
Code Section 6-31-140, all laws, ordinances,
resolutions, regulations, comprehensive
plans, land development regulations,
policies and rules adopted by the County and
the State of South Carolina in existence at
the time of this Agreement shall govern the
Development, with the following exception:
|
|
A.
Horry County
may apply subsequently adopted laws to the
Development only if it has held a public
hearing and determined that one (1) of the
following conditions is met:
|
|
(1)
the new laws are not in conflict with the
laws governing the Development and do not
prevent the Development;
(2)
the new laws are essential to the public
health, safety, or welfare and the laws
expressly state that they apply to a
development that is subject to a development
agreement;
(3)
the laws are specifically anticipated and
provided for in this Agreement;
(4)
the County can show that substantial changes
have occurred in pertinent conditions
existing at the time of approval of this
Agreement which changes, if not addressed by
Horry County, would pose a serious threat to
the public health, safety, or welfare;
(5)
this Agreement is based on substantially and
materially inaccurate information supplied
by the Property Owner; or
(6)
the provisions of this Agreement must be
modified or suspended to comply with state
or federal laws enacted after this Agreement
is executed, pursuant to South Carolina Code
of Laws Section 6-31-130.
|
|
16.
Amendment/Cancellation:
This Agreement may be amended or cancelled
by mutual consent of the parties hereto or
by their successors in interest. All
amendments must be approved by both the
Property Owner and the County. If an
amendment constitutes a major modification
(as defined below) to this Agreement, public
notice and a public hearing must be
conducted by the County Council. Minor
amendments may be approved by the County
Administrator. At the option of the County
Council, the public hearing may be held by
the County Planning Commission. For purposes
hereof, the following shall be deemed a
major modification of this Agreement:
|
|
A.
Significant
changes to the development schedule
time-frames set forth in this Agreement;
|
|
B.
Density
modifications not within the density ranges
set forth in the Horry County Zoning
Ordinance;
C.
Land use
changes beyond what has been allowed in the
approved Zoning Districts set forth in this
Agreement;
D.
Any major
miscalculations of infrastructure or
facility needs which create demand
deficiencies; especially those that
jeopardize the health, safety, and welfare
of the citizens of the county; or
|
|
E.
Any other
significant deviation from the master plan
that requires an updated plan to be produced
for review by the planning department.
17.
Periodic
Review:
The Property Owner, or its designee, shall
annually during the term of this Agreement
provide to the County Zoning Administrator
for review a report of progress of the
Development, including an updated Master
Site Plan showing all development completed
to date within Carolina Station and the
actual density within such developed areas.
Property Owner shall demonstrate in such
report its good faith compliance with the
terms of this Agreement. |
|
18.
Breach and
Cure By Property Owner:
If, as a result of a periodic review
conducted pursuant to the preceding
paragraph, the County finds and determines,
at its sole discretion, that the Property
Owner has committed a material breach of the
terms or conditions of the Agreement,
including its exhibits, or the Master Site
Plan approved by the County, as may be
amended from time to time, the County shall
serve upon the Property Owner written
notice, within a reasonable time after the
periodic review, setting forth with
reasonable particularity the nature of the
breach and the evidence supporting the
finding and determination, and providing the
Property Owner a reasonable time in which to
cure the breach. If the Property Owner fails
to cure the breach within the time given,
then the County unilaterally may terminate
or modify the Agreement; provided, that the
County has first given the Property Owner
the opportunity: |
|
A. to rebut the finding
and determination; or |
|
B.
to consent
to amend the Agreement and/or the Master
Site Plan approved by the County to meet the
concerns of the County with respect to the
findings and determinations.
|
|
Failure of the Property Owner to meet an
estimated commencement or completion date
shall not in and of itself constitute a
material breach of this Agreement, but must
be judged based upon the totality of the
circumstances, including without limitation
market conditions. |
|
19.
Breach and
Cure By Countv.
The Property Owner reserves the right to
terminate this Agreement in the event that
County fails to perform any material terms
or conditions of this Agreement and fails to
rectify such breach as set forth below. The
Property Owner must provide to the County
written notice of the alleged breach and
provide sixty (60) days to cure such breach.
If the breach is not cured by the County
within the allotted |
|
cure
period, then the obligations of the Property
Owner pursuant to this Agreement shall
terminate thirty (30) days after the County
receives written notice from the Property
Owner of their intent to terminate due to
the County's failure to cure. In the event
such cure by the County cannot be
accomplished within the sixty-day cure
period, the County shall be afforded further
reasonable time to cure said breach.
|
|
20.
Recordation.
The Property Owner agrees to record this
Agreement with the Horry County Register of
Deeds within fourteen (14) days after its
full execution thereof.
21.
Notices.
All notices hereunder shall be given in
writing by certified mail, postage prepaid
at the following addr~sses:
|
|
To
Property Owner:
International Paper Realty Corporation Attn:
Sabina Finnegan
421
Carmel Executive Park, Suite 315, Charlotte,
North Carolina 28226 |
|
With
a COpy To: Bellamy, Rutenberg,
Copeland, Epps,
Gravely,
&
Bowers, PA
Attn:
Claude M. Epps, Jr. and Jeffrey W. King 1000
29th Avenue North
PO Box
357
Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina 29577
|
|
To
Horry County: Horry County
Attn:
Zoning Administrator Government and Justice
Center 1301 Second Avenue
Conway, South Carolina 29526
|
|
A.
All
covenants, agreements, warranties and
provisions of this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties and their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, personal
representatives, successors and assigns.
|
|
B.
Any
reference herein to any governmental agency
shall be construed to mean any future
instrumentality which may be created and
designated as successor in interest to, or
which otherwise possesses any of the powers
and duties of, any referenced governmental
agency in existence on the effective date of
this Agreement. |
|
C.
This
Agreement has been made and entered into
under the laws of the state of South
Carolina, and those laws shall control the
interpretation of this Agreement.
|
|
D.
In the event
that any portion or section of this
Agreement is deemed to be invalid, illegal,
or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall
in
no manner
affect the remaining portions or section of
this Agreement, which |
|
shall
remain in full force and effect.
|
|
E.
This
Agreement may be executed in any number of
identical counterparts, any or all of which
may contain signatures of fewer than all of
the parties, but all of which shall be
construed together as a single instrument.
|
|
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Property
Owner has caused this Development Agreement
to be executed under seal as of the day and
year first above written.
|
|
Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence
of: |
|
International Paper Realty Corporation
|
|
I, the
undersigned notary, do hereby certify that
International Paper Realty Corporation by
its President, personally appeared before me
this day and acknowledged the due execution
of the foregoing instrument.
|
|
Witness my hand and seal this _ day of
_________________________________ ' 2007.
|
|
Notary
Public for South Carolina
My Commission Expires: ________________ _
(Seal)
|
|
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Horry
County this Development Agreement to be
executed as of the day and year first above
written. |
|
Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence
of: |
|
Its:
County Administrator |
|
I, the
undersigned notary, do hereby certify that
Horry County by its Zoning Administrator
personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged the due execution of the
foregoing instrument. |
|
Witness my hand and seal this _ day of
___________________________________ , 2007.
|
|
Notary
Public for South Carolina My Commission
Expires:
--------
(Seal)
|
|
EXHIBIT A
To
Carolina Station Development Agreement
|
|
PROPOSED ZONING DELINEATION AND ACREAGE
CHART |
|
TAX MAP
|
ZONING
|
APPROXIMATE |
TOTAL
|
|
NUMBER
|
DESIGNATION/USE |
ACREAG E
|
ACREAGE
|
|
|
|
DESIGNATED
|
|
|
074-00-01-
|
SF-14.5
|
1 4,128.22
|
1 4,128.22
|
|
001
|
|
|
|
|
074-00-01-
|
POD |
1 1,052.20
|
1 1,052.20
|
|
001
|
|
|
|
|
074-00-01-
|
SF-14.5
|
1 654.10
|
1654.10
|
|
088
|
|
|
|
|
074-00-01-
|
RE-3
|
1 20.80
|
1 20.80
|
|
088
|
|
|
|
|
088-00-01-
|
SF-14.5
|
1318.20
|
1318.20
|
|
068
|
|
|
|
|
088-00-01-
|
POD |
1 79.90
|
1 79.90
|
|
068
|
|
|
|
|
089-00-01-
|
SF-14.5
|
1 7.20
|
1 7.20
|
|
051
|
|
|
|
|
101-00-01-
|
RE-3
|
1 1 5.90
|
1 1 5.90
|
|
009
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
-
|
1 6276.52
|
|
|
|
|
AC
|
|
*Total
AC of SF-74.S mcludes-parks/open space,
lake, EMS, schools, recycling, worship
centers, and R.O. W. 'so "Acreages are based
upon CIS data and not on certified surveyed
information. |
|
EXHIBIT
B
To Carolina
Station Development Agreement
Master Site
Plan for Carolina Station prepared by The
Landart Company |
Click here
to return to table-menu for this page.
|